Services offered

We are happy to offer you all our services. Experience has shown that the following services may be of particular interest to you.
Symbol für den anlagenbezogenen Gewässerschutz

Water protection

Many of the hazardous substances required for the auxiliary systems are hazardous to water. Above certain quantities, these constitute installations within the meaning of the AwSV. The requirements of the AwSV must therefore be met. We are happy to offer you the following services:

Symbol für das Störfallrecht (StörfallV/12. BImSchV)

Hazardous incident law

Due to the materials handled and in particular the residual materials produced, thermal waste recycling plants can become operating areas in accordance with § 3 (5a) BImSchG, i.e. “major accident” plants.

We have specialized in particular in the assessment of residual materials and input materials in accordance with accident law. We are happy to offer you the following services:

You can find our contact details here

Suitability assessment

Expert opinion in accordance with Section 41 AwSV

According to § 63 WHG, the suitability of facilities for storage, filling and handling (LAU facilities) must be determined before construction and operation as well as after significant changes.

We will be happy to provide you with the relevant reports for submission to the competent authority.

Exemption from the requirement to determine suitability
As the operator, you have the option of making use of the exemption from the requirement to determine suitability (Section 41 AwSV) and having the suitability of your system determined by an AwSV expert by submitting the required evidence of the system components together with a water protection expert opinion.
Content of the expert opinion
Taking into account the evidence in accordance with § 41 (2) sentence 1 (e.g. general design approvals), it is demonstrated that the installation as a whole meets the water protection requirements.
Authority's deadline
The installation may be constructed and operated as planned if the competent authority has neither prohibited the construction or operation nor specified requirements for the construction or operation within a period of six weeks after submission of the relevant evidence and the water protection expert opinion.
Submit a request

Suitability assessment

Expert opinion according to § 42 AwSV

As part of the suitability assessment in accordance with Section 63 WHG, authorities may require the submission of an additional water protection expert opinion from an AwSV expert.

We will be happy to support you in communicating with the authorities to clarify the scope of the expert opinion and prepare the required expert opinion for submission to the authority responsible for you.

Content of the expert opinion
The content of the expert opinion can be any water protection-related content for which the authority requires the opinion of an AwSV expert.
Submit a request

Inspections

according to § 47 AwSV

Systems that fall within the scope of the AwSV must be inspected by an expert within the meaning of the AwSV in accordance with Section 47 AwSV.

We are happy to offer to carry out the necessary inspections for your AwSV systems.

Obligation to inspect according to location
Annex 5 of the AwSV specifies the inspection dates for systems outside protected areas or provisionally secured flood areas. Annex 6 lists the inspection dates for installations within the aforementioned areas.
Inspection dates and intervals
AwSV installations must be inspected before commissioning, after significant modification, periodically and when decommissioned.
Obligation to inspect
The obligation to inspect is specified for the various types of system in Annex 5 and Annex 6 of the AwSV. We would be happy to check the obligation to inspect your systems for you.
Anfrage stellen

Consulting

Do you have a specific question about the AwSV?

Feel free to contact us, we will of course also be happy to advise you on all your questions about plant-related water protection.

Submit a request

Classification of residual substances

within the meaning of the Major Accidents Ordinance (12th BImSchV)

Waste (residual substances) must be assigned to the most similar hazard category or the most similar named substance in accordance with the Major Accidents Ordinance in terms of their major-accident potential.

The KAS-61 guideline provides both a general assessment option and the option of classification with detailed knowledge. However, as the blanket classifications are necessarily conservative, it is often worth classifying your waste fractions using detailed knowledge. We would be happy to classify your waste for assessment in accordance with the Hazardous Incident Ordinance.

Assessment based on waste genesis
Assessment based on waste genesis The general classifications according to waste code numbers given in the KAS-61 guideline are based on a conservative assessment of all waste to be classified under this waste code. By knowing the waste genesis, hazardous characteristics can already be excluded here.
Assessment based on analysis results
Based on e.g. element analyses, a technically sound estimate of the maximum hazard potential to be expected can be made in the sense of a conservative assessment with fictitious (but real) compounds. Although this approach is also conservative, as a rule it is still possible to exclude generally assumed hazard characteristics.
Submit a request

Our contact options

Do you have questions about our services or need a quote? Feel free to contact us by phone, e-mail or via our contact form.

Phone
+49 (0) 1575 5296174
E-Mail
anfrage@anlagensicherheit-anger.de
Contact form
Contact us via contact form